Speaking at the LeWeb conference in Paris
government, basically - wrote a letter saying the Wikileaks activities were deemed illegal in the
As the New York Times has now pointed out, that's simply not true. The State Department "did not argue that publication of the documents by WikiLeaks, or any media organization, would be illegal." Instad, the State Department letter said the documents were leaked illegally, writing the documents were "were provided in violation of U.S.
This letter, further, was not sent to PayPal at all, but to Wikileaks.
So PayPal cut off WikiLeaks' access to its own money due to a State Department lawyer's letter it was not a party to, and due specifically to an accusation of illegality within that letter that wasn't even directed at Wikileaks. Having formulated this bizarre position, it specifically asked, according to the conference moderator in the video below, that it be asked about this very topic on stage at a tech conference. Amazing!
Given the level of integrity and due diligence the financial services industry has shown over the past two years, it's fair to assume all those other Wikileaks accounts have been frozen due to legal and ethical consideration that's about as solid as PayPal's.
Humble Request
Humble RequestKeep Clicking on advertising every day to motivate
Share this page: What's This? |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
Here are some rules for commenting on www.ShaanAli.info :
1,All comments except spams are welcome .
2,If you want to make a request ,please use English .
3,Do not use names such as Admin or Mod for commenting because it make others misunderstand .
That's all .Thanks for commenting .
4,Drop your comments Complaints Required Question In the Comments Box we Will reply you with in 24 hours